Had a more interesting time than expected at the Broadcast Learning & Development 08 conference in the swanky confines of BAFTA HQ (usual film types abound) on 195 Piccadilly yesterday.
Bit trepidation as Learning and Development (or L&D as those in the profession call it) is a bit outside of my knowledge zone – thus the trip to this conference – the first of it’s kind to discuss issues around skills and training in the broadcast (primarily TV and radio) industries.
It was jam-packered with HR and learning profs from places like BBC, ITV plus some indie people and a few freelancers. Generally they seem to be ‘nice ladies’ in their late 30s/40s who go into this line of work, and good on them because I believe in my own consultancy practice, and indeed my own professional development, you really can’t think enough about how you can keep improving and thinking about the impact of skills and the growth of people on your business practice.
Expertly faciliated by Radio 4’s Roger Bolton (of ‘Right to Reply‘ fame), my highlights of the day were:
Sell the value of L&D to your business – a balloon debate
This involved bailing out the dead weight of the least interesting speaker in a series of knock-out rounds. More Oxford Debating Society than Weakest Link. Frank Ash, Creative Consultant to the BBC discussed taking producers back to ’storytelling school’ fared second best, but Leah Harrison Singer of Bloomberg News scooped the prize by discussing measured journalism and training that ‘their man in Kazakhstan’ could access, use and make relevant – a huge challenge in training a global network of several thousand financial journalists. I tend to zone out when I hear a slick American presentation, so didn’t quite get it.
Workshop 2: Managing Talent
Jo Taylor of Channel 4’s 4Talent talked about the four pledges C4 have developed with their network of indie producers. Which were:
1. Book-end each production with a meeting discuss your personal development.
2. Establish mentoring relationships between senior professionals and less experienced staff.
3. Share experience and expertise through master classes.
4. ?
The handout they distributed was wrong so if anyone knows the answer to elusive pledge #4 please post in the comments.
These are all solid and good – cheap and easy to implement, whether you’re ITV or a micro-indie producer. However, the language still seems to frame L&D as something to implement in-house – the discussion across the day quickly zoned in on the favourable (nay jealous in present economy) position of the BBC and its responsibilities at training all of the increasingly freelance broadcast industries. Freelancers have the least access to training, and also to even know where appropriate training exists – or to even access a learning plan to know what their skills gaps they should be plugging are. A thorny issue, I felt not fully undertsood by the largely corporate broadcasting attendees. My own view is that spaces like Production Base website can become ‘watercoolers’ to connect people more effectively – all freelancers chat and learn from one another informally.
Brian Kelly of BECTU, I think sort of got it – saying we should empower individuals by collating learning resources under Creative Commons licences to distribute and share. David Knott from IBM talked about using platforms like Facebook to enable people to leverage existing technologies and structures – interesting take from the world’s leading supplier of IT services!
Many of the experienced faces in the room concluded that we’re very good at induction and starting to get better at diversity recruitment and bringing in talent. But after the early years, people get lost in the system and their actual personal plans and goals end up under the hamster wheel.
Yet lest we not forget how hard it can be to win the battle for diversity in the still largely ‘mini me’ TV industry. At a college open day in Hammersmith, a BBC HR rep was asked by young students – ’so what is the BBC, I’ve heard of it but I don’t know what it is?’. Many see the BBC as something not ‘for them’. (Though us digitalists may argue that many in this generation don’t even see TV as something for them). But from my own experiences of highly nepotistic, inaccessible and exclusive BBC recruitment over the last decade(“Regional development? But don’t you know we’re a national organisation?!” I kid you not), I’m tempted to agree with the girls from Hammersmith.
Yet the C4 Diversity Programme attracted 5,000 applicants – and yielded a diverse trainee group which included a traveller, Chinese, second careers and young black males. The BBC’s programme attracted 3,000 – many of the 71,000 page views wisely put off by a ‘reality check’ quiz before the application (“do you want to give over your days, nights and LIFE to programme making’? etc). A big question is how can we support the thousands who are rejected at the ‘open door’ stage – give them opportunities to develop themselves and come back next year.
What can we learn from other industries?
In short – not a lot. Or at least not that much from this generic collection of guys from IBM, Cegos, PIXELearning (sorry Kevin!) and Master Training Institute.
But what we did learn from Jeremy Blain from Cegos , Europe’s largest training and development survey you’ve never heard of, was that Europe has the highest participation in training in business (61%) and the highest ROI, yet the lowest budgets for professional development. Exit interviews show the majority of people quit, not because of their relationship with the company, but with their line manager.
Using Henry Ford’s analogy, you wouldn’t let a factory run at 60% capacity, yet we allow our human capital often to work on auto-pilot. Look at improving 100 people by just 1%, and that’s 100% growth. I’m not sure I like or agree with this analogy of people as ‘performance’ machines, but I do agree that people need to be empowered to develop their own training and learning. In France this is acheived by a 1% “do it or get taxed” levvy on professional development, yet this was thought to succeed due to the power of unions and also the generic non-bespoke nature of much of the training provided.
Richard Bradly from the Master Training Istutitute believe the most important question in planning training is WHY? You should ask yourself this at least seven times before starting to do anything.
- What – analyse the need. Maybe we don’t need to do anything.
- How – can managers be used to deliver it.
- You – walk the talk in delivering and doing.
David Knott of IBM believes online learning is key to success. The enterprise of the future needs to tip the 70% classroom to 30% online on it’s head to 30% classroom with 70% online resources to succeed. (In a later talk, Daniel Wain believes e-learning is most effective when combined with other types of ‘blended’ learning). An interested lesson an academic experiment teaches us:
Half the students were given an iPod lecture and resources. The other half attended lectures in the normal way. The iPod students came to seminars better prepared – not because the i-lecture was better, but they had access to the resources in advance to prepare. It’s how we set up the learning as much as how we deliver it.
The future of learning
Vanessa Arden-Wood of Illumina, one of the biggest and most interesting producers of cross-platform content, gave us a damning vision of the producer of the future from a persona of characters. The old media producer is a Tarentino wannabee, enabled by a love of consumption and nepotistic real-world connections. The producers of the future is highly mobile, networked (working remotely from Germany was the example), connected to streams of content via mobile, a broad media education balanced with a specialist technical education and an active contributor of content. This character description, I think, genuinally scared the largely old media room. Perhaps the media producer of the future is less of the ‘master hustler’ of old and more an expert leader in the future?
The skills gaps between old and new media:
- Online v TV platforms – requires active consumption and production
- Understanding that audiences create their own content
- Multi-platform strategies need to be specific to the requirements and benefits of each platform
- Commissioning – less about a drink in the pub, more about ITT’s and technical compliance.
Illumina often find staff who are skilled in old media or other areas and train them in-house using cross-department skills (‘i-schools’). As a company they aren’t big enough to outsource training, so everyone needs to contribute to the learning of the organisation. They provide breathing space for R&D activity for everyone – because again as a smallish producer, there is no seperate R&D function.
David Wain, consultant, believes training is the law of the jungle – stand still and be the gazelle that gets eaten first by the lion. But get the tools right – are we selling hearing aids by telephone? Consider the intent, the content, and finally the technology to judge the best way to deliver training.
Summing up
Mr Bolton summed up nicely – there are more plurality of channels, yet less diversity of voices. Broadcasting is not a democracy but needs to be elite in order to be outstanding. The BBC and others are just about broadcasting – the rest of what they do follows from that.
Myself, I learnt a lot. OD actually means Organisational Development, not the continual bleeting on about the economic situation. ‘Blended learning’ means doing different stuff – on and offline. And training in broadcasting is an area where technology and the changing nature of doing business online is having a great impact, but importantly training must deliver – organisations in these uncertain times need to fight to retain and develop their human and intellectual capital – and fight to survive.
Broadcast Training Awards
The post-event awards do presented by the new two-day old minister for skills (who he? exactly). It was a shame they were all big players nominated, but that probably says a lot about indie’s resources and abilities to implement dedicated training programmes in-house. And the nomiations were:
BBC – “Operation: Hamster Wheel” took Radio 1 producers of the treadmill and out and about to meet their audiences. In Scunthorpe.
Bloomberg News - Sophisticated tools to analyse the rapidly shifting markets delivered to a global network to help stem the overall economic collapse of the western world. Apparently.
ITV – Get a bunch of trainees in black t-shirts and trainers and get them to make a film about what ITV’s vision and values are. Everyone gets it now.
GCap Radio – Stemming the outflow and retaining more of their news staff, by, err, well not quite sure but Helen starts her new job at RAM FM in Derby next week, so it must have worked.
QVC - Their staff had a lot of fun at ‘The Office’ style new age workshops trying to sell each other a bottle of water QVC-style. QVC’s CEO thinks all his people have the ability to become leaders of the future.
And the winner was…
Bloomberg. Well given then impending economic apocalypse, we’re putting a lot of faith in their hands from now on. So let’s hope they’ve got their training plans right…